<![CDATA[Multiwfn forum / Question about how to simulate the fluorescence spectrum in ORCA]]> - //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?id=1745 Sun, 12 Oct 2025 12:20:48 +0000 FluxBB <![CDATA[Re: Question about how to simulate the fluorescence spectrum in ORCA]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5391#p5391 Thanks for your reply, Professor. But if we are to simulate fluorescence spectrum I thought the starting geometry should be an optimized excited state geometry, correct?

]]>
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 12:20:48 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5391#p5391
<![CDATA[Re: Question about how to simulate the fluorescence spectrum in ORCA]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5390#p5390 Hello,

The developer knows more than me. At least, I found the simulated emission spectrum in this way is correct. Maybe it was designed in that way.

]]>
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 12:13:11 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5390#p5390
<![CDATA[Question about how to simulate the fluorescence spectrum in ORCA]]> //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5386#p5386 Dear Prof. Lu,

In the ORCA tutorial
https://www.faccts.de/docs/orca/6.0/man … l/esd.html
in the part that talks about the simulation of fluorescence spectrum of benzene with vibronic effects (6.18.2. Fluorescence Rates and Spectrum), the optimized ground state geometry was used in the input file
*XYZFILE 0 1 BEN.xyz.
However, shouldn't we use the optimized "S1" excited-state geometry, that is,
*XYZFILE 0 1 BEN_S1.xyz?

Many thanks in advance.

Jano.

]]>
Sun, 12 Oct 2025 08:58:37 +0000 //www.umsyar.com/wfnbbs/viewtopic.php?pid=5386#p5386