Multiwfn forum

Multiwfn official website: //www.umsyar.com/multiwfn. Multiwfn forum in Chinese: http://bbs.keinsci.com/wfn

You are not logged in.

#2 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Error termination of Multiwfn during Shubin Liu's EDA » 2025-10-10 06:25:53

Can you comment on the second input? I believe this one is exactly like the example in the manual. But the output from this input also caused the crash.

#3 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Error termination of Multiwfn during Shubin Liu's EDA » 2025-10-09 14:35:20

The output lines while Gaussian entered L608 typically look like below:

(Enter /****/g09/l608.exe)
A total of   0 models will be applied.

Results using SCF density:
FoFJK:  IHMeth= 0 ICntrl=     500 DoSepK=F KAlg= 0 I1Cent=   0 FoldK=F
IRaf=         0 NMat=   1 IRICut=       1 DoRegI=T DoRafI=F ISym2E= 0.
FoFCou: FMM=F IPFlag=           0 FMFlag=           0 FMFlg1=           0
         NFxFlg=           0 DoJE=F BraDBF=F KetDBF=F FulRan=T
         wScrn=  0.000000 ICntrl=     500 IOpCl=  1 I1Cent=           0 NGrid=           0
         NMat0=    1 NMatS0=      1 NMatT0=    0 NMatD0=    1 NMtDS0=    0 NMtDT0=    0
Symmetry not used in FoFCou.
ET=  632.554426 EV=-2900.409564 EJ= 1019.606524 EK=  -79.090375 ENuc=  695.863243
Leave Link  608 at Thu Oct  9 21:43:40 2025, MaxMem=  2147483648 cpu:        24.8

#4 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Error termination of Multiwfn during Shubin Liu's EDA » 2025-10-09 14:29:23

I tried the following two input lines, and in both cases error termination happened.

[Input 1]
%nprocshared=2
%mem=16GB
%chk=filename.chk
#p scf=(maxcycle=300) sp pop=(nbo, full) M06/6-311+G** ExtraLinks=L608 nosym int=ultrafine

filename

charge multipl
coordinates

-54


[Input 2]
%nprocshared=1
%mem=16GB
%chk=filename.chk
# M06/6-311+G** ExtraLinks=L608

filename

charge multipl
coordinates

-54

#5 Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Error termination of Multiwfn during Shubin Liu's EDA » 2025-10-09 13:50:31

wham09
Replies: 7

Dear all,

I loaded my .fch file to Multiwfn, chose option 21 / suboption 2 for Shubin Liu's EDA, then loaded my .out file (with ExtraLinks=L608 input). Then I saw the error message (I uploaded the screenshot file) then the Multiwfn immediately terminated.

error-message.png

What should I do?

#6 Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Questions for EDA-FF analysis » 2025-10-09 09:19:14

wham09
Replies: 1

Dear all,

I have two questions about EDA-FF analysis.

1. I'm having a trouble constructing molecule type files. For certain elements (in my case, boron, phosphorus, and palladium) I cannot find the corresponding AMBER or GAFF types. These only appear as "?" in gaussview.

2. For atomic charges, are there any selection criteria for CHELPG versus MK charges?

Thank you very much in advance.

#8 Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Help with bond order analysis » 2025-10-01 08:30:21

wham09
Replies: 1

Dear all,

I have a few questions regarding Multiwfn's bond order analysis.

1. From what I read in the manual, the Wiberg bond order analysis seems to work well with diffuse functions. Am I correct?

2. Is the Laplacian bond order analysis sensitive to diffuse functions?

3. Is the Laplacian bond order analysis appropriate for carbon-boron bonds, where the boron atom is tetracoordinate, anionic boron-ate? An example would be alkyl trifluoroborate salt.

4. Is the Laplacian bond order analysis appropriate for carbon-palladium bonds?

Thank you very much in advance.

#9 Quantum Chemistry » TDDFT calculation for UV-Vis simulation » 2025-09-30 17:50:31

wham09
Replies: 2

Dear all,

I am trying to do TDDFT calculations to predict UV-Vis spectra of my compounds. I succeeded for an organic compound, but for an organometallic complex (palladium), the calculation ended with an error.

My input is as below:

%nprocshared=2
%mem=16GB
%chk=xxx.chk
#p   scf=(maxcycle=300)   pop=(nbo,full)   scrf=(smd, solvent=dichloroethane)
M06/gen   TD(NStates=30)   guess=read   nosym   int=ultrafine

filename

charge/spin
coordinates

P C H F B 0
6-311+G**
****
Pd 0
SDD
****

The error message is as below:
Excessive mixing of frozen core and valence orbitals.
Error termination via Lnk1e in xxx/g09/g09/l801.exe

I normally put pseudo=read into my inputs, but here I didn't do it because I read somewhere that this is not compatible with TDDFT. The only difference from the input for the purely organic compound is that I used a mixed basis set. I tried M06/6-311+G**/SDD with no separate basis set block, but that also ended with another error.

#10 Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Exporting interbasin surfaces for visualization with VMD » 2025-09-24 09:03:44

wham09
Replies: 1

Dear all,

I was trying to visualize the topology map of my molecule by VMD. I could follow the instructions (manual section 4.2.5) and currently can visualize the CPs and paths. Is it also possible to visualize the interbasin surfaces (together with CPs and paths) by VMD?

Thank you very much.

#11 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Question on NBO analysis » 2025-09-20 01:07:37

I see. Would you say it is currently not possible at all (using any software)?

#12 Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Question on NBO analysis » 2025-09-19 23:23:27

wham09
Replies: 3

Dear all,

What I want to do is as below:

Let's say there is a complex, consisting of 2 fragments (just like the situation of CDA analysis). There would be an NBO of a certain chemical bond of interest in the structure of the fragment A, whose electron density map would be reorganized in some extent when the fragment A and B form the whole complex. What I want to do is find out which NBO's in the structure of fragment B are responsible for this NBO reorganization (as well as the nature of the interactions and the % contributions).

Would this be possible by Multiwfn? Thank you very much in advance.

#14 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Question on charge decomposition analysis » 2025-09-19 13:39:51

sobereva wrote:
wham09 wrote:

I have one more question. Should I NOT employ diffuse functions also when I want to do orbital composition analysis or NCI analysis?

Different orbital composition analysis methods have different compatibility with diffuse functions, they have been documented in the manual. For example, if you use Mulliken or SCPA method to calculate orbital compositions, then diffuse functions should not be used, while methods like Hirshfeld and Becke can be used in any case.

All real space function analysis, such as IGMH, IRI, valence electron density, NCI, all kinds of AIM analysis, etc., are fully compatible with diffuse functions.


What about NBO method for orbital compositions?

Thanks for the explanations!

#15 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Question on charge decomposition analysis » 2025-09-19 10:46:05

I have one more question. Should I NOT employ diffuse functions also when I want to do orbital composition analysis or NCI analysis?

#16 Re: Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Question on charge decomposition analysis » 2025-09-19 10:40:56

Thank you for the quick reply!

1. Would M06 / def2-TZVP / SDD be a fine choice then?

2. The whole system and both fragments are not open-shell (you can see above that multiplicity of all three are 1. So I still don't understand why this happens.

#17 Multiwfn and wavefunction analysis » Question on charge decomposition analysis » 2025-09-19 08:28:59

wham09
Replies: 8

Dear all,

I am having a problem doing charge decomposition analysis. The analysis program itself seems to be working, but there are multiple odd things.

First, my complex and the two components are all not open-shell systems, but the programs says otherwise. See below:

Loading basic information of complex... Please wait
Alpha electrons:    193     Beta electrons:    193     Multiplicity:  1
The number of atoms in complex:       109
The number of basis functions in complex:      1460
....
Input .mwfn/.fch/.molden/.gms file of fragment   1
....
Loading basic information of this fragment... Please wait
Alpha electrons:    144     Beta electrons:    144     Multiplicity:  1
The number of basis functions in this fragment:      1108
The number of atoms in this fragment:        85
....
Input .mwfn/.fch/.molden/.gms file of fragment   2
Loading basic information of this fragment... Please wait
Alpha electrons:     49     Beta electrons:     49     Multiplicity:  1
The number of basis functions in this fragment:       352
The number of atoms in this fragment:        24

Loading orbitals information for complex...
Note: The complex is an open-shell system
Flip electron spin of complex? (y/n)
y
Loading orbitals information for fragment   1...
Note: This fragment is an open-shell system
Flip electron spin of fragment   1? (y/n)
y
Loading orbitals information for fragment   2...
Note: This fragment is an open-shell system
Flip electron spin of fragment   2? (y/n)
Y

So I tried all 8 combinations of yes and no's to try analysis anyways, but the following problems were not solved by this.

1. The numbers of d, b, r are often very large and seems wrong. Below is a part of my data:
....
     178    1.000000  -25.809571  -22.818702   -2.990869  -43.363119
     179    1.000000  366.313880 -135.214450  501.528330 -202.616715
     180    1.000000  -50.070482  -10.590196  -39.480286  185.599172
     181    1.000000  272.544276  -13.180447  285.724723  -46.430657
     182    1.000000 -130.499120   -2.286675 -128.212445  -59.984506
....
      Sum:     193.000000  200.675262  294.833313  -94.158051 -270.692556

2. The fragment orbital contributions to molecular orbitals look really wrong. See below:
Alpha orbital   127 of fragment  1, Occ: 1.00000    Contribution:11725.51 %
Alpha orbital   128 of fragment  1, Occ: 1.00000    Contribution:38893.07 %
Alpha orbital   129 of fragment  1, Occ: 1.00000    Contribution:******** %
Alpha orbital   130 of fragment  1, Occ: 1.00000    Contribution: 5021.00 %
Alpha orbital   131 of fragment  1, Occ: 1.00000    Contribution:45494.56 %
Alpha orbital   132 of fragment  1, Occ: 1.00000    Contribution:62854.03 %


My Gaussian input commands look like this:

%nprocshared=8
%mem=16GB
%chk=....chk
#p
scf=(maxcycle=300)
sp
pop=(full)
iop(3/33=1)
uM06/gen
pseudo=read
nosym
int=ultrafine

[filename]

[charge/mult]

[coordinates]

P C H F 0
6-311+G**
****
Pd 0
SDD
****

Pd 0
SDD

After calculations were done, I generated .fch files by formchk and used them as the input files.

I'd be very grateful if anyone can tell what is the problem.

Thanks for your help in advance!

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

Baidu
map